A new poll released by Trends and Insights for Africa  (TIFA) Research sheds light on public awareness and perceptions surrounding the Kenyan government's Subsidized Fertilizer Programme (FSP).

The findings reveal a high level of national recognition for the initiative, with 82 per cent of respondents overall acknowledging the program.

However, the report also highlights concerns about the quality of the subsidized fertilizer, with a significant portion of the population placing blame on a specific government official.

The survey results indicate significant regional variations in program awareness.

Residents in agricultural heartlands like Mt. Kenya, Central Rift, and Western regions showcased the highest levels of awareness, reaching a staggering 90 per cent in Mt. Kenya.

Read More

  1. Kithure Kindiki leads, Mithika Linturi lags in latest TIFA cabinet performance report
  2. Farmers left in limbo as Govt. halts distribution of subsidized NPK fertilizer
  3. KEBS alleges fraud as substandard fertiliser scandal unfolds in Kenya

Conversely, awareness dipped in regions with limited agricultural activity, with Nairobi and Northern Kenya registering the lowest figures at 71 per cent and 68 per cent, respectively.

The report delves deeper, exploring the public perception of responsibility for the alleged poor quality of some subsidized fertilizer.

Among those aware of the program, a clear majority (53 per cent) pointed the finger at Agriculture Cabinet Secretary Mithika Linturi. Interestingly, nearly a fifth (17 per cent) remained unsure of who bears the most responsibility.

It's important to note that the data collection concluded just before the arrest of senior officials from the National Cereals and Produce Board (NCPB) on suspicion of involvement in the distribution of poor-quality fertilizer.

TIFA acknowledges the potential impact of these arrests on public opinion had they occurred earlier.

These findings suggest a potential disconnect between the government's efforts to promote agricultural development and the public's experience with the FSP.

While the program enjoys high recognition, concerns about quality raise questions about its effectiveness.

Further investigation and potentially improved quality control measures could be crucial for restoring public trust and ensuring the program delivers on its intended benefits for Kenyan farmers.