A man stands accused before a Mombasa court of disseminating false information, implicating a woman in the alleged embezzlement of funds from Kilifi Governor Gideon Mun'garo.

Jimmy Charles Mureithi faces charges under the Computer Misuse and Cybercrime Act of 2018 for purportedly publishing misleading claims on his Facebook profile, tarnishing the reputation of Loise Makena.

Mureithi, using the alias 'Mureithi Wa Lucy', allegedly propagated allegations against Makena, suggesting her involvement in defrauding the governor of a significant sum, an act that Senior Resident Magistrate David Odhiambo deems as a violation of Section 23 of the aforementioned act.

During the court proceedings, Mureithi pleaded not guilty to the charges brought against him.

However, the prosecution, led by Senior Prosecution Counsel Barbara Sombo, argued against his immediate release on bail, citing ongoing police investigations.

Read More

  1. Kwale Governor Fatuma Achani proposes steep hike in 'muguka' entry fees
  2. Muguka ban by Mombasa and Kilifi county bosses is null and void - Ruto
  3. Kilifi County bans sale, use of 'muguka'

Authorities sought to extend Mureithi's detention to facilitate a comprehensive probe, including the scrutiny of two mobile phones recovered from the accused, suspected to have been instrumental in the dissemination of the false information.

Concerns were raised by investigators regarding the possibility of accomplices involved in the purported crime, indicating a need for thorough scrutiny of digital evidence to ascertain the extent of the misinformation spread.

In response to these developments, Odhiambo ruled for Mureithi's remand at the Central Police Station in Mombasa for a period of two days to allow for the conclusion of investigations.

Additionally, the court mandated his appearance on Thursday, with provisions for his release on a Sh500,000 bond.

The case highlights the growing concern over the proliferation of false information on social media platforms and underscores the legal ramifications individuals may face for their involvement in such activities.

As the judicial process unfolds, it serves as a reminder of the importance of responsible online behaviour and the repercussions of spreading unsubstantiated claims that can damage reputations and incite public unrest.