In a significant legal development, former Kenya Pipeline managing director Charles Tanui and fifteen others have been acquitted of charges related to an alleged conspiracy to defraud the parastatal of Sh644 million.

The ruling, delivered by Anti-corruption Magistrate Felix Kombo, emphasized the necessity of establishing a shared intention among the accused for the conspiracy charge to hold, stating the conspiracy charge was not established.

According to Magistrate Kombo, there was a lack of evidence demonstrating a collective intent among the accused individuals to defraud the Kenya Pipeline company.

However, the court did find some of the accused liable to answer other fraud-related charges, signalling that legal proceedings will continue for certain individuals.

The case revolves around a tender concerning the supply of Hydrant Puit Valves, including two-year operational spares, from Aero Dispenser Valves Company Limited.

Read More

  1. Ruto cancels Adani's Sh334 billion JKIA and KETRACO deals over US indictments
  2. Persistent KRA customs system outages stall cargo clearance, cut revenue
  3. Govt rolls out major JKIA reforms to elevate passenger experience

The procurement aimed to replace faulty Hydrant Pit Valves at the Jomo Kenyatta International Airport, crucial gadgets used for aircraft refuelling.

Initially charged in December 2018, the suspects were implicated in the misappropriation of public funds linked to the procurement process.

While the acquittal of Tanui and others may mark the end of this particular legal battle for them, it raises broader questions about the standards of evidence required in proving conspiracy charges and the complexities of managing public procurement.

As the legal process unfolds, scrutiny is likely to intensify on the intricacies of the procurement process and the handling of public funds.

The verdict's implications are significant, not only for the individuals involved but also for the broader accountability and transparency within Kenya's public institutions.